Skip to main content

myCOtrak: an app which records smoking, nicotine use and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations concurrently for use in smoking research

Abstract

Objective

Smoking during pregnancy poses significant health risks, necessitating accurate continuous monitoring of pregnant women’s smoking behaviours. Existing methods relying on self-reporting lack objectivity, while biochemical measures like exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) provide validation but suffer from low participant engagement. We developed myCOtrak to address these limitations by integrating real-time CO monitoring with self-reported smoking, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and e-cigarette use.

Results

myCOtrak combines automated CO data from the Bedfont iCO monitor with daily surveys. It demonstrated high feasibility and usability in initial testing with 23 participants, with 75% continuing data submission for ≥ 14 days. Key features include seamless CO integration, cloud-based storage, and longitudinal tracking, offering a validated, scalable tool for smoking cessation research.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Smoking during pregnancy remains a major public health concern, linked to complications including preterm birth, low birth weight, and developmental issues, as well as long-term consequences for the child’s health [1, 2]. In the UK, smoking rates during pregnancy have declined, with 7.4% of women in England smoking at the time of delivery in 2023-24 [3]. However, the rate remains high in certain regions and among vulnerable populations, such as younger women and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. For instance, some deprived areas in the North West, like Blackpool, have consistently recorded smoking-at-delivery rates double the national average [4].

Many studies evaluate interventions to help pregnant women stop smoking. While some incorporate biochemical verification methods to objectively measure smoking behaviour [5, 6], many still rely primarily on self-reported data, such as surveys or interviews. These methods can be biased by recall and social desirability, which can be particularly problematic during pregnancy due to the stigma associated with smoking. This highlights the need for continuous monitoring of smoking behaviour over time to more accurately evaluate intervention effectiveness [7, 8]. Remote methods for validating self-reported data have become more common but face issues like poor sample return rates [9].

Therefore, we describe how we adapted NicUse — a previously developed bespoke data collection app [10] and created the myCOtrak app. myCOtrak works with the Bedfont iCO monitor [11] to collect and transmit self-reported smoking behaviour data and exhaled CO concentrations to a research database. This method overcomes low return rates associated with validation samples (e.g. saliva) sent by post, and, as it is an impersonal measurement method, it minimises any reluctance to return validation samples related to social desirability bias caused by stigma related to smoking in pregnancy. Furthermore, the app generates time-series data that enable detailed and temporaral behavioural observations to facilitate monitoring and evaluation.

Main text

NicUse

NicUse is a mobile app that collects smoking habits, NRT use, and e-cigarette consumption. The design and pilot testing of NicUse is described elsewhere [10]. Evaluated among 35 pregnant women over 28 days, the app demonstrated high usability and acceptability, with 96% finding it easy to use. Data validity was supported by a significant correlation between self-reported smoking behaviours and exhaled CO readings collected independently of the app. This suggests that, while NicUse successfully captures self-reported data, incorporating objective measures like CO monitoring could further improve its accuracy in capturing smoking behaviour.

Bedfont iCO monitor and iCOquit mums to be

The Bedfont iCO monitor [11, 12] is a handheld carbon monoxide (CO) device that provides a reliable measure of CO concentrations in expired breath, offering real-time insights into smoking behaviour and exposure to harmful CO, both critical during pregnancy. It operates via the ‘iCOquit Mums to Be’ app, allowing pregnant women to track their exposure to CO non-invasively.

While the iCOquit Mums to Be app allows users to take CO readings, it does not support concurrent data collection on smoking behaviours, NRT use, or e-cigarette consumption. This limitation led to the development of myCOtrak, which integrates CO monitoring with comprehensive self-reporting, enabling a more streamlined and holistic approach to tracking smoking behaviour.

myCOtrak

As mentioned in 2.1, we aimed to extend the uses of NicUse by enabling the app to receive CO concentration readings from the Bedfont iCO monitor, and so providing validation for the self-report data. myCOtrak was developed from NicUse to provide this functionality and works alongside Bedfont’s iCOquit Mums to Be App.

myCOtrak includes financial incentives (currently set at £1 per day), represented as credits in the app, for completing daily surveys, promoting engagement. This addresses a key limitation of existing apps like iCOquit Mums to Be, which lack reward-based engagement strategies. Surveys include questions similar to those in NicUse, focusing on smoking, NRT, and e-cigarette use in the past 24 h, with some modifications, such as excluding detailed NRT use information in myCOtrak. This adjustment was made to simplify the task, ensuring participants can more easily complete the study and remain engaged throughout. Also, this level of detail was not essential for the app’s primary objectives. Clear instructions emphasise that any response earns credits, displayed under a calendar on the summary page (see Fig. 1 below). Participants receive notifications of new credits after each survey submission, which can be redeemed for real rewards like gift cards. Additional features include daily survey reminders and feedback options for the research team, similar to NicUse [10, 13].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Data sharing between iCOquit Mums to be and myCOtrak

Figure 1 demonstrates how CO concentrations generated by the iCOquit Mums to Be app are shared with myCOtrak on Android devices. After logging into the iCOquit Mums to Be, the user follows on-screen instructions to provide a CO reading, taps the ‘share’ button in the screen’s top right corner and selects myCOtrak. The reading then appears on the myCOtrak home screen. The participant can now complete the rest of the survey by selecting the corresponding date on the calendar.

What sets myCOtrak apart from NicUse is its integration real-time objective measures, rather than relying only on self-reports. By using myCOtrak to assess the outcomes of smoking cessation interventions, we aim to find a more effective way to help pregnant women quit smoking.

How myCOtrak works

Figure 2 illustrates how myCOtrak is used with the iCOquit Mums to Be app and an iCO monitor. Briefly, the user opens both apps, follows standard instructions on the iCO Mums to Be app to take a CO reading using the iCO monitor, and then operates the ‘Share’ menu to send the reading to myCOtrak.

Fig. 2
figure 2

myCOtrak workflow

myCOotrak allows for seamless, remote collection of biochemically validated CO readings, taken via the Bedfont iCO monitor, providing a clear and objective measure of smoking status, complementing self-report measures. Since data are collected daily, it holds the potential for exploring longitudinal relationships between smoking patterns and NRT and/or e-cigarette use.

myCOtrak user interface

Figure 3 illustrates how myCOtrak appears on Android devices, with a similar layout on iOS devices. Each user is assigned a unique code for app access. Figure 3a shows the login page; users only need to login once. Figure 3b displays the landing page seen immediately after logging in. Figure 3c shows the home page featuring a calendar. On the calendar, a pink tick below a date signifies that the survey for that day has been completed, while a blue pin indicates an incomplete one. Users tap on a ‘blue pin’ date to start the survey for that day. To ensure that myCOtrak measures real time CO concentrations concurrently with self-reported smoking, participants can only complete surveys once on the day that CO readings are collected. Once a reading is shared with myCOtrak, the home page updates with the time, date, and CO reading (as highlighted and shown in Fig. 3d). Participants are then prompted to record the number of cigarettes they smoked in the past 24 h for comparison with their CO reading. Figure 3e shows an example survey page, asking participants to report the time since they last smoked and measured their CO level. Users are guided through the entire survey, regardless of their answers. Pop-up instructions are provided to help users complete the survey, while alerts are triggered only in cases of errors, such as lack of signal or submission failures. Before submission of each daily survey and CO concentration, users are prompted to either edit or confirm their answers as correct (Fig. 3f). Full survey questions are in the supplementary document. Once submitted, the data are immediately uploaded to a cloud database [14]. At this point, users can no longer modify the survey responses for that day, and no data are stored on their device.

Fig. 3
figure 3

User Interface of myCOtrack

myCOtrak researcher interface

The myCOtrak researcher interface or web portal is designed for monitoring survey completion, managing participants’ accounts, troubleshooting and collecting user feedback. Survey completion tracking is illustrated in the supplementary document. It allows researchers to manage surveys proactively, enabling them to identify and, if necessary, contact participants who have not completed their surveys. It also allows researchers to flag participants who provide particular responses to specific questionnaire items while the research is ongoing. Surveys can be scheduled to start on specific dates, such as a participant’s smoking quit date.

myCOtrak acceptability testing

Initial myCOtrak testing involved four research team members (two male and two female, all non-smokers), using a mixture of Android and iPhones. Testing assessed ease of downloading, in-app text and appearance, and functionality in conjunction with the Bedfont iCO monitor and the app. Team feedback led to minor cosmetic/textual changes to myCOtrak. Further testing was carried out with four nonpregnant smokers, who were not research team members, over a two-week period (all female, again using both phone types) to check ease of use and identify any problems. Finally, testing was carried out repeatedly on the same day with one male smoker to check the variation in CO readings.

Currently, a study is underway using myCOtrak to collect daily self-reported smoking and other nicotine use data alongside breath CO readings among pregnant/recently pregnant women who smoke. We have recruited 23 participants to date, 19 of whom have successfully downloaded myCOtrak and submitted an initial report without a researcher/health professional present, and 15 of whom (> 75%) have continued to provide data for at least 14 days, which is half of project duration, and approximately 58% (11 participants) have inputted data more than 20 days. Results describing the relationship between self-reported smoking and CO readings using myCOtrak will be published in a separate paper.

Conclusions

myCOtrak collects accurate, real-time data on smoking status in various contexts, including situations where in-person visits are not feasible. Originally developed for a study on pregnant women, it is adaptable for other groups to monitor changes in smoking behaviour. Its remote, scalable design makes it a valuable tool to maintain continuity in data collection and participant engagement for research and monitoring, especially during situations like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Limitations

myCOtrak offers an objective approach to monitoring daily smoking behaviour, e-cigarette use and other nicotine use, but has some potential limitations:

  1. 1.

    User Compliance: Success depends on user engagement. If a project required regular CO readings and self-reports, users would require a high level of adherence, which may vary due to forgetfulness, lack of motivation, or technological difficulties. However, not all studies require repeated measurements. Also, in our experience, a small daily incentive for app completion (e.g. £1 in shopping vouchers per report) appears effective in maintaining participation.

  2. 2.

    Technical Barriers: Limited mobile access, poor broadband reception or app usability challenges could reduce myCOtrak‘s accessibility among certain populations. Technical issues such as software bugs, connectivity problems, or challenges in syncing with the iCOquit Mums to Be device may also reduce its usability. Additionally, the iCO monitor cannot connect directly to myCOtrak via the Bedfont API, requiring users to take their CO reading through the iCOquit Mums to Be app and then share the reading with myCOtrak, before completing the rest of the survey.

  3. 3.

    Biological Variability: Environmental factors like second-hand smoke or air pollution can affect CO levels, leading to misinterpretation of smoking status. This could complicate the interpretation of the data, particularly if participants are exposed to high levels of CO exposure from non-smoking sources. We will report the strength of the relationship between self-reported smoking and CO readings obtained via myCOtrak in a separate paper as mentioned in Sect. 2.5.

  4. 4.

    Limited Scope: Since our study primarily focuses on CO readings, myCOtrak may not fully capture all aspects of smoking cessation behaviour, such as the psychological or social challenges involved. Future versions could incorporate additional survey questions on such factors (e.g. mood, environment).

  5. 5.

    Cost and Resource Limitations: Providing iCO monitors to all participants and troubleshooting technical issues or replacing faulty devices require significant resources, particularly in large studies.

Despite these limitations, myCOtrak represents a significant advancement in remote, objective monitoring of smoking behaviour. Unlike standalone apps that simply transmit CO readings to researchers, myCOtrak integrates them with self-reported smoking behaviours in real-time, offering a comprehensive and dynamic view of smoking patterns. We are currently evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of myCOtrak for users while also quantifying how well exhaled CO concentrations align with concurrently reported smoking behaviours submitted through the app.

Data availability

This manuscript focuses on the description of the development and functionality of myCOtrak. Data supporting this study have been collected and are currently under analysis. These data will be made available upon publication of the subsequent results. Requests for access to the dataset can be directed to Dr Yue Huang (yue.huang@nottingham.ac.uk) or Dr Joanne Emery (Joanne.Emery@uea.ac.uk). The dataset includes anonymised self-reported smoking behaviours, NRT/e-cigarette use, and exhaled CO concentrations collected via myCOtrak app.

Abbreviations

NRT:

Nicotine replacement therapy

CO:

Carbon monoxide

References

  1. Avşar TS, McLeod H, Jackson L. Health outcomes of smoking during pregnancy and the postpartum period: an umbrella review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12884-021-03729-1 PMID: 33771100.

  2. Cnattingius S. The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(S2):S125–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Statistics on Women’s Smoking Status at Time of Delivery. England-Quarter 4, 2023-24, https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-women-s-smoking-status-at-time-of-delivery-england/statistics-on-womens-smoking-status-at-time-of-delivery-england-quarter-4-2023-24.Access 4 Oct,24.

  4. Smoking. in pregnancy. https://www.blackpooljsna.org.uk/Starting-Well/Maternity/Smoking-in-Pregnancy.aspx#:~:text=As noted above%2C in Blackpool,This compares to 8.8%25 nationally. Access 20 Jan, 25.

  5. Coleman T, Clark M, Welch C, Whitemore R, Leonardi-Bee J, Cooper S, Hewitt C, Jones M, Sutton S, Watson J, Daykin K. Effectiveness of offering tailored text message, self‐help smoking cessation support to pregnant women who want information on stopping smoking: MiQuit3 randomised controlled trial and meta‐analysis. Addiction. 2022;117(4):1079–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hajek P, Przulj D, Pesola F, et al. Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine patches for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2022;28:958–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41591-022-01808-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gorber SC, Schofield-Hurwitz S, Hardt J, Levasseur G, Tremblay M. The accuracy of self-reported smoking: A systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. Nicotine Tob Res. January 2009;11(1):12–24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ntr/ntn010

  8. Shipton D, Tappin DM, Vadiveloo T, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Chalmers J. Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4347. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/bmj.b4347. PMID: 19875845; PMCID: PMC2771076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Thrul J, Howe CL, Devkota J, Alexander A, Allen AM, Businelle MS, Hébert ET, Heffner JL, Kendzor DE, Ra CK, Gordon JS. A scoping review and Meta-analysis of the use of remote biochemical verification methods of smoking status in tobacco research. Nicotine Tob Res. 2023;25(8):1413–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ntr/ntac271. PMID: 36449414; PMCID: PMC10347976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang Y, Emery J, Naughton F, Cooper S, McDaid L, Dickinson A, Clark M, Kinahan-Goodwin D, Thomson R, Phillips L, Lewis S, Orton S, Coleman T. The development and acceptability testing of an app-based smart survey system to record smoking behaviour, use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and e-cigarettes. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1):100. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-022-05983-8. PMID: 35272684; PMCID: PMC8908557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. iCOquit Pilot Study Utilizing Personal Bluetooth CO Devices for Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy. https://www.bedfont.com/icoquit-pilot-study-utilizing-personal-bluetooth-co-devices-for-smoking-cessation-during-pregnancy/. Access 7 Oct, 24.

  12. Smokerlyzer. https://www.bedfont.com/products/smokerlyzer/. Access 7 Oct, 24.

  13. Emery J, Huang Y, Naughton F, Cooper S, McDaid L, Dickinson A, Clark M, Kinahan-Goodwin D, Thomson R, Phillips L, Lewis S, Coleman T. Comparison of a daily smartphone app and retrospective questionnaire measures of adherence to nicotine replacement therapy among pregnant women: observational study. JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e35045. https://formative.jmir.org/2-23/1/335045.

  14. Host, run, and code Python in the cloud! https://www.pythonanywhere.com/. Access 2 Jan, 25.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research. This article presents independent research under project number 585.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YH drafted the manuscript, and TC, JE, and LM led the editing process. FN and MC provided feedback on the final version. YH developed myCOtrak, with TC, FN, JE, and SC assisting in its prototype development. TC is the principal investigator for this study. JE and LM led participant recruitment process with support from MC, and AD handled CO monitor distribution.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted by London - Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 21/LO/0123). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Research was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Emery, J., McDaid, L. et al. myCOtrak: an app which records smoking, nicotine use and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations concurrently for use in smoking research. BMC Res Notes 18, 158 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-025-07195-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-025-07195-2

Keywords