- Research Note
- Open access
- Published:
Comparison of nasopharyngeal bacteriological profile between patients with diabetes and healthy individuals in Accra, Ghana
BMC Research Notes volume 17, Article number: 362 (2024)
Abstract
Background
The nasopharynx is characterised by a rich microbial diversity, making it an important endogenous reservoir for respiratory infections. People living with diabetes (PLWD) have a high risk for acquisition of respiratory tract infections, but their nasopharyngeal bacterial flora have rarely been investigated.
Aim
To investigate the nasopharyngeal bacterial flora among PLWD and non-diabetics at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra.
Methodology
This study was a case-control one, involving 130 each of PLWD and non-diabetics. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained from the participants and cultured for bacteria, which were identified using MALDITOF mass spectrometry.
Results
The bacterial flora present in the anterior nares of the participants of both study groups was characterised by a rich diversity, comprising both Gram-positives and Gram-negatives. In the diabetics, the dominant bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii (19.6%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (18.12%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.2%), and Rahnella aquatilis (12.3%). In the control group, however, the dominant bacteria were Staphylococcus epidermidis (21.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (19.0%), Proteus mirabilis (10.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.2%), Acinetobacter baumannii (8.8%), and Enterobacter cloacae (7.2%). Between groups, Acinetobacter baumannii (19.6% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.014) and Rahnella aquatilis (12.3% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001) recorded a significantly higher prevalence in the diabetes group than in the control group. On the contrary, Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.0% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.003), Proteus mirabilis (2.2% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.006), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.7% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.001) had significantly lower prevalence than in the control group.
Conclusion
The nasopharyngeal bacterial flora of PLWD in Accra seems to have comparable diversities with those of non-diabetics. Nonetheless, the PLWD had a higher carriage rate of Acinetobacter baumannii but seem to have some protection against carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Introduction
The nasopharynx is an anatomical conduit between the nose and the throat, specifically found behind the nasal cavity and above the soft palate and oropharynx [1]. It is a major ecological niche for a variety of bacteria – such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Nesseiria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis – which co-exist with each other in an intricately delicate symbiotic mix referred to as microbial homeostasis [2, 3]. This homeostasis is essentially a product of an interplay of antagonism, synergism, and competition among the various colonising species [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. For example, hydrogen sulphide-mediated antagonism exists between S. aureus and S. pneumoniae [11, 12] and between S. aureus and N. meningitidis [4]. Other molecular mechanisms of antagonism, insights of which remain unclear, exist between S. aureus and each of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis [13]. In contrast, some sort of synergism exists among H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and S. pneumoniae, especially, within polymicrobial biofilms [7, 9, 10, 14].
The rich microbial diversity of the nasopharynx makes it an important endogenous reservoir for respiratory infections, which usually occur following major perturbations in the microbial homeostasis [15,16,17]. Examples of such homeostasis-disrupting events include increased antibiotic consumption and immune suppression [18,19,20,21]. People living with diabetes (PLWD), who comprise about 10% of the global adult population, are a recognised immunocompromised group who have a high vulnerability to hospitalisations and respiratory infections [22,23,24,25]. Prevention and proper management of these infections require an improved understanding of how the nasopharyngeal microbiota of PLWD differs from that of those with no diabetes, but such data are largely non-existent. To help fill the identified knowledge gap, this study provides a snapshot comparison of the microbiota of the nasopharynx between PLWD and non-diabetics at the largest tertiary care facility in Ghana.
Methodology
This case-control study was done at the National Diabetes Management and Research Centre (NDMRC) which can be found on the premises of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH). The NDMRC is the biggest centre in Ghana dedicated to diabetes care and mainly offers outpatient services to its over 7500 registered patients, approximately 70–80 of whom visit the centre daily. The patients comprise PLWD referred from KBTH, as well as those from other healthcare facilities around the country.
In total, 130 each of PLWD and non-diabetic participants were sampled from July 2022 to April 2023. The diabetes patients were expected to have clinically-proven diabetes and to be aged between 15 and 95 years. The non-diabetics were recruited based on their fasting/random blood sugar levels less than or equal to 7.0 mmol/l and less than or equal to 11.1 mmol/l for random blood sugar results (and not on glucose-lowering medications), and were between 15 and 95 years old. Potential participants who had disease warranting hospitalisation and/or a recent (two weeks) history of antimicrobial therapy were excluded. Participants’ data were gathered with a standard questionnaire. Nasopharyngeal swabs were taken by a qualified infectious disease nurse who had been trained to sample the nasopharynx during the COVID-19 pandemic, via rotation of sterile calcium alginate swabs at the anatomical site. The specimens were thereafter kept in vials containing 1 ml skim milk-tryptone-glucose-glycerin (STGG). Within four hours of collection, they were transported to the Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, which is about 500 m from the sampling site, for laboratory processing. The processing involved an initial vortexing and a subsequent storage at -80 ˚C, until needed.
At the laboratory, specimen processing and bacterial identification were done as previously described [26, 27], with a few modifications. Plating of the samples was preceded by a pre-enrichment step. Media on which the samples were cultured included 5% sheep blood agar with and without gentamicin supplementation, chocolate agar, and mannitol salt agar. The blood and chocolate agar plates were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2, whereas the MacConkey and mannitol salt agar plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C, all for 24 to 48 h. Subculturing was performed until pure cultures were obtained, followed by bacterial identification using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
STATA 14 (Strata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for the data analysis. Chi square and Fisher’s exact tests were used in comparing the bacteriological profile between the diabetics and non-diabetics, at a 0.05 alpha level.
This study was approved by the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana (Unique identifier: “CHS-Et/M.1–4.7/2021–2022”). Written informed consent was also obtained from all the participants.
Results
In total, 130 each of PLWD and non-diabetic individuals participated in this study, and they had identical gender distributions – in each group, 17.7% (n = 23) were males and 82.3% (n = 107) were females. Similarly, the mean age was identical for both groups (59.4 ± 10.1 years), as was the age range (28 to 89 years), and the only existing co-morbidity was diabetes, which was present among participants of the diabetes group. Furthermore, the participants of the diabetes group mainly had Type 2 diabetes (95.4%, n = 124), while just a few had Type 1 diabetes (4.6%, n = 6); the duration of diabetes was less than 10 years for 33.1% (n = 43), 10–20 years for 49.2% (n = 64), and greater than 20 years for 17.7% (n = 23) of the participants.
The bacterial flora present in the anterior nares of the participants of both study groups was characterised by a rich diversity, comprising both Gram-positives and Gram-negatives (Table 1). In the PLWD, the dominant bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii (19.6%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (18.12%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.2%), and Rahnella aquatilis (12.3%). In the control group, however, the dominant bacteria were Staphylococcus epidermidis (21.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (19.0%), Proteus mirabilis (10.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.2%), Acinetobacter baumannii (8.8%), and Enterobacter cloacae (7.2%).
Between groups, Acinetobacter baumannii (19.6% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.014) and Rahnella aquatilis (12.3% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001) recorded a significantly higher prevalence in the diabetes group than in the control group. On the contrary, Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.0% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.003), Proteus mirabilis (2.2% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.006), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.7% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.001) each had a significantly lower prevalence than in the control group.
Discussion
The nasopharynx is characterised by a rich microbial diversity, making it an important endogenous reservoir for respiratory infections [1,2,3, 15,16,17]. People with diabetes have high vulnerability to hospitalisations and respiratory infections [23,24,25], but have hardly been studied in connection with their nasopharyngeal microbiota. A well-rounded understanding of how the nasopharyngeal microbiota of PLWD differs from that of those without diabetes is crucial to effective prevention and management of respiratory infections that may arise among them. To help fill the identified knowledge gap, this study aimed to provide a snapshot comparison of the microbiota of the nasopharynx between PLWD and non-diabetics at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
The richness in nasopharyngeal bacterial diversity in both study groups is consistent with what is generally known about the nasopharyngeal bacterial flora [1,2,3]. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were key colonisers in both study groups, with comparable relative proportions within each of the study groups. This is interesting, especially, given that they are known to be antagonistic to each other [28, 29]. Probably, when it comes to Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis colonisation in the nasopharynx, there are interplays introduced by age which are not necessarily cancelled out by diabetes status. It is noted that of the two, S. aureus is credited with a higher clinical significance, and especially in PLWD, it is the predominant cause of infections [30, 31]. This may, however, be of little relevance in the studied cohort of PLWD. This is because the proportions of the pathogen between them and their non-diabetic counterparts were not significantly different, which suggests that adults may generally share the same risks when it comes to S. aureus carriage, regardless of diabetes status. It remains to be seen whether this observation is universal for PLWD, given that a recent study published by Mizgała-Izworska et al. [32] in Poland also reported similar S. aureus carriage risks between PLWD and non-diabetics. Moreover, the ease of transmissibility of AMR determinants between the Staphylococci, especially, the methicillin resistance-conferring SCCmec-harboured mecA gene, suggests that S. epidermidis merits further clinical attention [33,34,35].
The significantly higher carriage prevalence of A. baumannii among the diabetes group is noteworthy, given the endured high importance of this coloniser as a priority pathogen in the context of AMR [36, 37]. Moreover, the pathogen has been implicated in respiratory tract infections involving PLWD [23,24,25]. Although pathogen carriage does not necessarily result in infections, the probability that A. baumannii respiratory infections had origins from nasopharyngeal carriage is high [38,39,40]. That notwithstanding, longitudinal studies would be important to determine variations in the carriage of the pathogen over time and how these translate to infections. Insights on this epidemiological gap could be bolstered further if the sites for these studies are geographically diverse.
The significantly lower carriage prevalence of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa among the PLWD is noteworthy, as it suggests that diabetes probably confers some protection against carriage of these pathogens. It is unclear what the mechanism of this seeming protective advantage of diabetes is, and thus, further investigations are warranted. This is because these organisms are part of critical- and high-priority pathogens which have received a lot of attention for high AMR as well as high morbidities, mortalities, and healthcare costs [36, 37]. The mechanism(s) underlying this observation, if determined, could be exploited in the control of these pathogens.
Limitations
This study had a few limitations. First, owing to its cross-sectional nature, it does not distinguish persistent carriage from intermittent carriage, and does not provide information on spatio-temporal variation in the microbiota composition. Also, non-culturable bacteria may have been missed, as culture-based techniques were relied upon in the study. Future studies employing metagenomics techniques could allow for generation of more complete insights, which could cover in-depth information on the nasopharyngeal mycobiome and virome.
Conclusion
The nasopharyngeal bacterial flora of PLWD in Accra seems to have comparable diversities with those of non-diabetics. Nonetheless, the PLWD had a higher carriage prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii but seem to have some protection against carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Data availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- AMR:
-
Antimicrobial resistance
- KBTH:
-
Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
- MALDI-TOF:
-
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
- NDMRC:
-
National Diabetes Management and Research Centre
- PLWD:
-
People living with diabetes
- STGG:
-
Skim milk-tryptone-glucose-glycerin
References
Cleary DW, Clarke SC. The nasopharyngeal microbiome. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2017;1:297–312. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1042/ETLS20170041
Bogaert D, Keijser B, Huse S, Rossen J, Veenhoven R, van Gils E, et al. Variability and diversity of nasopharyngeal microbiota in children: a metagenomic analysis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17035. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0017035
Biesbroek G, Tsivtsivadze E, Sanders EAM, Montijn R, Veenhoven RH, Keijser BJF, et al. Early respiratory microbiota composition determines bacterial succession patterns and respiratory health in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:1283–92. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1164/rccm.201407-1240OC
Pericone CD, Overweg K, Hermans PWM, Weiser JN. Inhibitory and bactericidal effects of hydrogen peroxide production by Streptococcus pneumoniae on other inhabitants of the upper respiratory tract. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3990–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/IAI.68.7
Lee GM, Huang SS, Rifas-Shiman SL, Hinrichsen VL, Pelton SI, Kleinman K, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in children in the post-PCV7 era. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:110. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1471-2334-9-110
David MZ, Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:616–87. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/CMR.00081-09
Chien Y-W, Vidal JE, Grijalva CG, Bozio C, Edwards KM, Williams JV, et al. Density interactions among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus in the nasopharynx of young Peruvian children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32:72–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/INF.0b013e318270d850
Shak JR, Vidal JE, Klugman KP. Influence of bacterial interactions on pneumococcal colonization of the nasopharynx. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:129–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.005
Perez AC, Pang B, King LB, Tan L, Murrah KA, Reimche JL, et al. Residence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis within polymicrobial biofilm promotes antibiotic resistance and bacterial persistence in vivo. Pathog Dis. 2014;70:280–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/2049-632X.12129
Lewnard JA, Huppert A, Givon-Lavi N, Pettigrew MM, Regev-Yochay G, Dagan R, et al. Density, serotype diversity, and fitness of Streptococcus pneumoniae in upper respiratory tract cocolonization with nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:1411–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/infdis/jiw381
Regev-Yochay G, Dagan R, Raz M, Carmeli Y, Shainberg B, Derazne E, et al. Association between carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in children. JAMA. 2004;292:716–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/jama.292.6.716
Park B, Nizet V, Liu GY. Role of Staphylococcus aureus catalase in niche competition against Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:2275–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/JB.00006-08
Pettigrew MM, Gent JF, Revai K, Patel JA, Chonmaitree T. Microbial interactions during upper respiratory tract infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1584–91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3201/eid1410.080119
van den Bergh MR, Biesbroek G, Rossen JWA, de Steenhuijsen Piters WAA, Bosch AATM, van Gils EJM, et al. Associations between pathogens in the upper respiratory tract of young children: interplay between viruses and bacteria. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47711. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0047711
de Steenhuijsen, Piters WA, Heinonen S, Hasrat R, et al. Nasopharyngeal microbiota, host transcriptome, and disease severity in children with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:1104–15.
de Steenhuijsen Piters WA, Huijskens EG, Wyllie AL, et al. Dysbiosis of upper respiratory tract microbiota in elderly pneumonia patients. ISME J. 2016;10:97–108.
Man WH, de Steenhuijsen Piters WA, Bogaert D. The microbiota of the respiratory tract: gatekeeper to respiratory health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:259–70.
Krone CL, van de Groep K, Trzcinski K, Sanders EAM, Bogaert D. Immunosenescence and pneumococcal disease: an imbalance in ́ host-pathogen interactions. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:141–53. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70165-6
Teo SM, Mok D, Pham K, Kusel M, Serralha M, Troy N, et al. The infant nasopharyngeal microbiome impacts severity of lower respiratory infection and risk of asthma development. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:704–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.008
Prevaes SMPJ, de Winter-de Groot KM, Janssens HM, de Steenhuijsen Piters WAA, Tramper-Stranders GA, Wyllie AL, et al. Development of the nasopharyngeal microbiota in infants with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:504–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1164/rccm.201509-1759OC
Pittman JE, Wylie KM, Akers K, Storch GA, Hatch J, Quante J, et al. Association of antibiotics, airway microbiome, and inflammation in infants with cystic fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:1548–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-121OC
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium. 2022; Available online: https://www.diabetesatlas.org (accessed on 6 October 2023).
Kornum JB, Thomsen RW, Riis A, Lervang HH, Schønheyder HC, Sørensen HT. Diabetes, glycemic control, and risk of hospitalization with pneumonia: a population-based case-control study. Diabetes Care 2008; 31:1541–1545. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2337/dc08-0138 PMID: 18487479.
Gil-Prieto R, Pascual-Garcia R, Walter S, Álvaro-Meca A, Gil-De-Miguel Á. Risk of hospitalization due to pneumococcal disease in adults in Spain. The CORIENNE study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;0(0):1–6.
Abu-Ashour W, Twells L, Valcour J, et al. The association between diabetes mellitus and incident infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5:e000336.
Dayie NTKD, Tetteh-Ocloo G, Labi AK, Olayemi E, Slotved HC, Lartey M, Donkor S, E. Pneumococcal carriage among sickle cell disease patients in Accra, Ghana: risk factors, serotypes and antibiotic resistance. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0206728.
Anafo RB, Atiase Y, Dayie NTKD, Kotey FCN, Tetteh-Quarcoo PB, Duodu S, Osei M-M, Alzahrani KJ, Donkor ES. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection of diabetic foot ulcers at a tertiary care hospital in Accra, Ghana. Pathogens. 2021;10:937. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/pathogens10080937
Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, Takada K, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits >Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature. 2010;465(7296):346–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nature09074
Olson ME, Todd DA, Schaeffer CR, Paharik AE, Van Dyke MJ, Büttner H, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis agr quorum-sensing system: signal identification, cross talk, and importance in colonization. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(19):3482–93. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/JB.01882-14
Hatipoglu M, Mutluoglu M, Uzun TV, Lipsky G B.A., Turk-DAY Study Group, Sevim E, Demiraslan H, Eryilmaz E, Ozuguz C, et al. Causative pathogens and antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot infections: a prospective multi-center study. J Diabetes Complicat. 2016;30:910–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.02.013
Smit J, Søgaard M, Schønheyder H, et al. Diabetes and risk of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a populationbased case-control study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(5):631–9.
Mizgała-Izworska E, Żywiec J, Klekotka R, Lukas W. Bacteriological profile of the nasopharynx in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2023;30(1):183–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.26444/aaem/158024
Lambert PA. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: modified target sites. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:1471–85.
Tashiro M, Izumikawa K, Ashizawa N, et al. Clinical significance of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci obtained from sterile specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;81:71–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.09.019
Saber H, Jasni AS, Jamaluddin TZMT, Ibrahim R. A review of Staphylococcal Cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) species. Malays J Med Sci. 2017;24(5):7–18. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.2. Epub 2017 Oct 26. PMID: 29386968; PMCID: PMC5772811.
Shlaes DM, Bradford PA. Antibiotics—from there to where? Pathog Immun. 2018;3:19–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.20411/pai.v3i1.231
Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, Han C, Bisignano C, Rao P, Wool E, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
Al-Sultan AA. Diabetic patients are threatened by superbugs Acinetobacter baumannii in Saudi Arabia hospitals. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;21:351. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.1144
Dexter C, Murray GL, Paulsen IT, Peleg AY. Communityacquired >Acinetobacter baumannii: clinical characteristics, epidemiology and pathogenesis. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2015;13:567–73. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1586/14787210.2015.1025055
Yan X, Song J-F, Zhang L, Li X. Analysis of risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms in diabetic foot infection. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22:46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12902-022-00957-0
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the study participants, the staff of the NDMRC, and the laboratory and technical staff of the Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualisation, E.S.D. and F.C.N.K.; methodology, N.T.K.D.D., Y.A., P.B.T.-Q., M.-M.O., F.C.N.K., and E.S.D.; validation, N.T.K.D.D., Y.A., P.B.T.-Q., M.-M.O., F.C.N.K., and E.S.D.; formal analysis, M.S.D.-D., N.T.K.D.D., F.C.N.K., and E.S.D.; investigation, Y.A., P.B.T.-Q., M.S.D.-D., M.-M.O., B.B.B., G.O.S., I.O.J., and E.S.D.; resources, F.C.N.K., N.T.K.D.D., Y.A., P.B.T.-Q., M.S.D.-D., M.-M.O., B.B.B., and E.S.D.; data curation, F.C.N.K., Y.A., M.S.D.-D., M.-M.O., B.B.B., G.O.S., I.O.J., and E.S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C.N.K. and E.S.D.; writing—review and editing, F.C.N.K., N.T.K.D.D., Y.A., P.B.T.-Q., M.S.D.-D., M.-M.O., B.B.B., G.O.S., I.O.J., and E.S.D.; visualisation, F.C.N.K., N.T.K.D.D., P.B.T.-Q., M.S.D.-D., and E.S.D.; supervision, N.T.K.D.D., Y.A., and E.S.D.; project administration, E.S.D., N.T.K.D.D., and M.S.D.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana (Unique identifier: “CHS-Et/M.1–4.7/2021-2022”).
Consent to participate
Written and oral informed consent were obtained from all the participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dei-Dzeha, M.S., Dayie, N.T.K.D., Atiase, Y. et al. Comparison of nasopharyngeal bacteriological profile between patients with diabetes and healthy individuals in Accra, Ghana. BMC Res Notes 17, 362 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-024-07003-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-024-07003-3