Skip to main content

Table 1 Feedback of the participants (n = 113)

From: Development and evaluation of an online cardiotocography course tailored to LMIC settings: a feasibility study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka

Question

Strongly disagree, n (%)

Disagree, n (%)

Neither agree nor disagree, n (%)

Agree, n (%)

Strongly agree, n (%)

Learning objectives were clearly mentioned

3 (2.7)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

35 (31.0)

75 (66.4)

Learning objectives were appropriate to the course (missing = 1)

2 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

35 (31.3)

75 (67.0)

Presentation slides were clear and easy to understand

2 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

4 (3.5)

29 (25.7)

78 (69.0)

Content covered in this course was relevant to my work setting

2 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

3 (2.7)

27 (23.9)

81 (71.7)

Audio narration was clear and consistent throughout the course (missing = 3)

1 (0.9)

1 (0.9)

2 (1.8)

35 (31.8)

71 (64.5)

Visual aids used were appropriate (missing = 1)

2 (1.8)

1 (0.9)

1 (0.9)

34 (30.4)

74 (66.1)

Pre course assessment and post course assessment were consistent with the learning objectives (missing = 2)

2 (1.8)

1 (0.9)

1 (0.9)

42 (37.8)

65 (58.6)

Pre course assessment and post course assessment were appropriately challenging (missing = 2)

4 (3.6)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.9)

37 (33.3)

69 (62.2)

Supplementary reading materials were clearly stated to support student success (missing = 3)

2 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

2 (1.8)

45 (40.9)

61 (55.5)

The overall delivery of the course will improve my patient care (missing = 1)

2 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

2 (1.8)

31 (27.7)

77 (68.8)