Skip to main content

Table 3 Major risk predictors associated with health issues in poultry farmers by fitting different regression models represented by M numbers

From: A cross-sectional survey of poultry management systems, practices and antimicrobial use in relation to disease outbreak in Pakistan

Predictor

β- coefficients

Count (n = 140)

Health issues staff reported, n = 31 (22.14%)

Prevalence Ratio (95% CI)

Significance

M1

Intercept

 

NA

 

0.22 (0.09—0.53)

***

Farmer’s Education

Secondary

18

4 (22.22%)

REF

NA

Higher secondary

35

11 (31.43%)

1.41 (0.52—3.82)

NS

Graduation

56

10 (17.86%)

0.80 (0.29—2.25)

NS

Post-graduation

31

6 (19.35%)

0.87 (0.28—2.68)

NS

M2

Intercept

NA

 

0.07 (0.02—0.25)

***

Farming Experience

Less than 5 years

30

2 (6.67%)

REF

NA

5 to 10 years

65

14 (21.54%)

3.23 (0.78—13.33)

NS

More than 10 years

45

15 (33.33%)

5.00 (1.23—20.30)

*

M3

Intercept

NA

 

0.23 (0.15—0.35)

***

Epidemic Training Status

Untrained

66

15 (22.73%)

REF

NA

Self-research

23

4 (17.39%)

0.77 (0.28—2.07)

NS

Trained

51

12 (23.53%)

1.04 (0.53—2.01)

NS

M4

Intercept

NA

 

0.40

***

Farm Type

Controlled

30

12 (40.00%)

REF

NA

Semi controlled

48

8 (16.67%)

0.42 (0.19—0.90)

*

Open

62

11 (17.74%)

0.44 (0.22—0.89)

*

M5

Intercept

NA

 

0.12 (0.06—0.25)

***

Labor Capacity

Less than 3

50

6 (12.00%)

REF

NA

3 to 5

57

11 (19.29%)

1.61 (0.64—4.03)

NS

More than5

33

14 (42.42%)

3.54 (1.51—8.27)

**

M6

Intercept

NA

 

0.29 (0.20—0.42)

***

Breed Type

Broiler

66

19 (28.79%)

REF

NA

Layer

36

8 (22.22%)

0.77 (0.38—1.58)

NS

Desi and crosses

38

4 (10.51%)

0.37 (0.13—1.00)

*

M7

Intercept

NA

 

0.27 (0.19—0.39)

***

Flock Management

All-in-all-out

74

20 (20.03%)

REF

NA

Multiple flocks and all-in-all-out

55

9 (16.36%)

0.61 (0.30—1.23)

NS

Continuous topping

11

2 (18.18%)

0.67 (0.18—2.49)

NS

M8

Intercept

NA

 

0.20 (0.09—0.44)

***

Cleaning Frequency

Every 5 days

25

5 (20.00%)

REF

NA

Every 10 days

48

8 (16.67%)

0.83 (0.30—2.28)

NS

Every 30 days

67

18 (26.87%)

1.34 (0.56—3.23)

NS

M9

Intercept

 

NA

 

0.17 (0.03—1.00)

*

Litter Disposal

Open place

6

1 (16.67%)

REF

NA

Drain

36

6 (16.67%)

1.00 (0.14—6.91)

NS

Pit

98

24 (24.49%)

1.47 (0.24—9.09)

NS

M10

Intercept

NA

 

0.03 (0.01—0.12)

***

Disease Outbreak

No

64

2 (3.13%)

REF

NA

Yes

76

29 (38.16%)

12.21 (3.03—49.21)

***

M11

Intercept

 

NA

 

0.18 (0.12—0.26)

***

Disease Outbreak Avian Influenza

No

120

21 (17.50%)

REF

NA

Yes

20

10 (50.00%)

2.86 (1.59—5.13)

***

M12

Intercept

 

NA

 

0.20 (0.14—0.29)

***

Disease Outbreak Fowl Typhoid

No

122

25 (20.49%)

REF

NA

Yes

18

6 (33.33%)

1.63 (0.78—3.41)

NS

  1. The significant predictors that cause an increase in health issues are shown with a bold italic font, whilst those that cause a decrease in health issues, are shown with an italic font as compared to reference (REF), with the prevalence ratio/risk ratio shown in bold
  2. *NA refers to Not Applicable; NS refers to Non-significant
  3. *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001