Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and presence of mutations by group

From: Genetic analysis of uterine lavage fluids to identify women at high risk of endometrial cancer

Characteristic

Overall, N = 2571

Controls, N = 881

EIN, N = 801

EC, N = 891

p-value2

Age (years)

56 (48, 67)

47 (44, 51)

53 (48, 62)

66 (59, 73)

< 0.001

BMI (kg/m2)

30 (25, 36)

29 (23, 31)

31 (25, 41)

31 (27, 35)

0.006

Parity

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.589

ā€ƒ0

24 (15.8%)

10 (19.2%)

6 (14.6%)

8 (13.6%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ1

33 (21.7%)

10 (19.2%)

7 (17.1%)

16 (27.1%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ2

80 (52.6%)

24 (46.2%)

24 (58.5%)

32 (54.2%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ3

14 (9.2%)

7 (13.5%)

4 (9.8%)

3 (5.1%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ4

1 (0.7%)

1 (1.9%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

Ā 

Hormonal contraceptives

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.001

ā€ƒNo

112 (74.2%)

34 (65.4%)

27 (65.9%)

51 (87.9%)

Ā 

ā€ƒYes

37 (24.5%)

18 (34.6%)

14 (34.1%)

5 (8.6%)

Ā 

ā€ƒNot known

2 (1.3%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (3.4%)

Ā 

Hypertension

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.002

ā€ƒNo

78 (51.3%)

36 (69.2%)

21 (51.2%)

21 (35.6%)

Ā 

ā€ƒYes

74 (48.7%)

16 (30.8%)

20 (48.8%)

38 (64.4%)

Ā 

DM

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.070

ā€ƒNo

125 (82.2%)

47 (90.4%)

36 (87.8%)

42 (71.2%)

Ā 

ā€ƒDM I

1 (0.7%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒDM II

25 (16.4%)

5 (9.6%)

5 (12.2%)

15 (25.4%)

Ā 

ā€ƒNot known

1 (0.7%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (1.7%)

Ā 

PAD3

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.007

ā€ƒNo

130 (85.5%)

48 (92.3%)

38 (92.7%)

44 (74.6%)

Ā 

ā€ƒYes

21 (13.8%)

3 (5.8%)

3 (7.3%)

15 (25.4%)

Ā 

ā€ƒNot known

1 (0.7%)

1 (1.9%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

Ā 

Any mutation NGS

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.501

ā€ƒNo

100 (38.9%)

32 (36.4%)

29 (36.2%)

39 (43.8%)

Ā 

ā€ƒYes

157 (61.1%)

56 (63.6%)

51 (63.7%)

50 (56.2%)

Ā 

POLE EDM4

4 (1.6%)

1 (1.1%)

1 (1.3%)

2 (2.2%)

> 0.999

AKT1

6 (2.3%)

2 (2.3%)

2 (2.5%)

2 (2.2%)

> 0.999

APC

23 (8.9%)

6 (6.8%)

10 (12.5%)

7 (7.9%)

0.395

ARID1A

58 (22.6%)

24 (27.3%)

16 (20.0%)

18 (20.2%)

0.428

ARID5B

17 (6.6%)

9 (10.2%)

2 (2.5%)

6 (6.7%)

0.132

ATM

50 (19.5%)

22 (25.0%)

16 (20.0%)

12 (13.5%)

0.152

CDKN2A

6 (2.3%)

2 (2.3%)

2 (2.5%)

2 (2.2%)

> 0.999

CTNNB1

21 (8.2%)

7 (8.0%)

5 (6.2%)

9 (10.1%)

0.655

EGFR

5 (1.9%)

2 (2.3%)

2 (2.5%)

1 (1.1%)

0.745

FBXW7

16 (6.2%)

8 (9.1%)

5 (6.2%)

3 (3.4%)

0.285

FGFR2

15 (5.8%)

3 (3.4%)

4 (5.0%)

8 (9.0%)

0.298

HRAS

1 (0.4%)

1 (1.1%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.654

KRAS

35 (13.6%)

15 (17.0%)

16 (20.0%)

4 (4.5%)

0.007

NRAS

3 (1.2%)

1 (1.1%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (2.2%)

0.776

PIK3CA

40 (15.6%)

18 (20.5%)

12 (15.0%)

10 (11.2%)

0.236

PIK3R1

26 (10.1%)

9 (10.2%)

8 (10.0%)

9 (10.1%)

0.999

POLD1

14 (5.4%)

6 (6.8%)

3 (3.8%)

5 (5.6%)

0.697

POLE

30 (11.7%)

11 (12.5%)

9 (11.2%)

10 (11.2%)

0.957

PPP2R1A

11 (4.3%)

6 (6.8%)

3 (3.8%)

2 (2.2%)

0.313

PTEN

71 (27.6%)

25 (28.4%)

23 (28.7%)

23 (25.8%)

0.896

RB1

12 (4.7%)

5 (5.7%)

2 (2.5%)

5 (5.6%)

0.572

RPL22

19 (7.4%)

6 (6.8%)

8 (10.0%)

5 (5.6%)

0.536

TP53

12 (4.7%)

7 (8.0%)

4 (5.0%)

1 (1.1%)

0.081

  1. 1Median (IQR); n (%)
  2. 2Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test; Pearson’s Chi-squared test
  3. 3Peroral Antidiabetic Drugs
  4. 4POLE exonuclease domain mutations